On Nations

What is the minimum possible requirement to make a new nation?

* 1 paper (map)
* 2 persons (negotiators)
* 3 lines (an enclosed area for the new nation)


Of course, this is too simplistic & nation building takes a lot more than the above.


The "1 paper" is preceded by a lot many papers in the form of books, printed debates, statesmen's notes, pamphlets, etc. etc.


The "2 persons" are simply putting the finishing touches to the efforts of many many more who contributed (their blood, toil, tears & sweat).


The "3 lines" is the most efficient way out, but many more shapes are added during negotiations (peaceful or otherwise) apart from those created historically by human settlements.


But what really is a nation?? When did the nation first come into existence - existence as an idea, existence as a concept, existence as a reality? In a world of co-mingled identities & blurred divisions, how can the nation stay a clear, demarcated entity?


The nation is simply a sharing of spoils by self-proclaimed conquerers. Men, as the most evolved animals, have crafted this planet amongst themselves. Some animals, in the wild, mark their their territories by their urine. Men, with their devolved senses & evolved sciences, do so with physical demarcartion. But while territorialism in other animals is a show of individual supremacy, but a communal effort in the case of men.

(to be contd... )

discontinous posts

I have been finding it difficult to sit on a blog post for a considerable length of time. For some time I will try to sit more often (though infrequently) and jot my thoughts rather than develop the entire idea. Hopefully, a few posts would make a complete picture.

(Of course, you would then have to return more often & my blog would get more eyeballs!! This is just coincidental, though)

Individual is Infinite

Man was born free. All collectives of humans evolved long long after the first men. It was Man that created religion, caste, community, society, nation. Unfortunately, the creator is now captive to the very structures it brought into being because some people discovered the utility of these structures and gained control over them and now reign over the lives of silent, passive majority.

Communities (of nations, religions, sects) unify men but it is a limited unification. These effectively divide man from man. Instead of striving for own good, individual efforts are subverted for communal benefit. Collectives are restrained in their aspirations and achievements by their self-imposed boundaries or conflict of interests or sloth. A collective restrains the potential of the individual.

Unfortunately, the forces of division are so firmly entrenched that people are incapable of even imagining a free world. And the collectives command disproportionate physical force to defend their positions against individual resistance; transformation to a free world, thus, being near impossible. However, the least thinking men can do is rid themselves of all loyalties to collectives not formed by them.

When men start following a religion that they have created, are loyal to a nation that they have made and are associated with communities whose goals are aligned to their personal objectives, we would have taken the first step towards a free world.

0.0

Individual is Infinite

Selfishness is Supreme

Material is the Master